Saturday, 3 December 2011

IS CHRISTMAS OUTDATED?


Now, there’s an impertinent question. But realistically, with commercialism  now dominant in our cultural environment, that has to be asked of our Christian Advent and Christmas celebrations and worship.

Here’s what commercial preparations for Christmas are like this year where I live: Sears’ Wish Book catalogue arrived in July. Christmas decorations went up soon as Hallowe’en was over. Advertising and sales started at the same time. Black Friday madness spread to Canada the day after American Thanksgiving trying to keep Canadians at home for their Christmas shopping. And so on … and on … and on….

It isn’t as simple to fix as suggested by the once popular slogan, “Put Christ Back into Christmas.” Many who attend our Christmas Eve service doubt the whole story, but cannot bring themselves to admit it. Do their childhood  memories still haunt them?

Nor are the traditional “Christmas Pageants” sufficient to dispell the ghosts of Christmases past. Everyone expects the same drill telling the now familiar composite story: The Babe born in a manger in Bethlehem while angels sang overhead. Shepherds hastening from their pastures and three wise men arriving from the east carrying symbolic gifts.

Or was it that way? The narratives in Matthew’s and Luke’s Gospels cannot be pushed together without doing violence to both.

Of course, biblical scholars have long raised serious doubts about the whole legend of the Nativity. It is story but not history, they say. Two of the four Gospels, Mark and John, make no mention of it. In one of his letters written a decade or more before the earliest Gospel of Mark was composed, the Apostle Paul didn’t say anything except that Jesus “was born of woman” and “born under the law.” Paul knew Jesus’ brother, James, but said nothing more about his parents. He seems to have assumed that the birth was perfectly natural for any human being then or now.

Progressive views have tried to turn the Christmas story from doctrine to reality. Geza Vermes has written one of the best studies of the event in his The Nativity: History and Legend. (London, Penguin 2006). He presents the “virgin” birth as a totally human event in the life of the Mary. He suggests that she may have been a child bride who had not yet begun her menstrual cycles. So she was still a virgin in terms of Judaism of that day.

John Shelby Spong states unequivocally in his latest book, Re-Claiming The Bible In A Non-Religious World (HarperCollins and HarperOne, 2011): “While no reputable scholar today thinks of these stories as literal history, we do find some historical links in the stories that we can use for dating purposes.” He cites King Herod’s death as recorded in 4 BCE, so Jesus must have been born before that for his birth to have been historical. Contrary to his usual counsel against literalism, is that his attempt to make it history? He doesn’t mention that it was Saint Dionysius the Small who established the year 1 as Anno Domini. That wasn’t until 625 AD/CE.

For several hundred years after the Christian faith tradition began its spread from Palestine to Rome and beyond, the Church did not mark Christmas at all. It wasn’t an important feast on the Christian calendar. Now, like any other religious holiday in the present secular and multicultural age, it is becoming less and less important for most people.

The local congregation where I worship is waiting to see if the traditional three Christmas Eve service will be well attended this year. An online discussion about the beginning of Advent raised serious concerns about the discouraging downer of the scriptures read during the four Sundays of Advent before Christmas.

The question for all Christian churches is whether we change our liturgical celebrations of Advent and Christmas to match the advances of modern biblical scholarship or match the massive impact of commercialism.

And yet ….. A colleague writing the back page article in The United Church Observer for December 2011 has told us to “stop looking for theological loopholes and simply rejoice in the mind-exploding miracle of the birth of God in the very human child of Bethlehem.”

Isn’t that what Christmas is about?

-30-

No comments:

Post a Comment